Posts Tagged ‘Inspection Software’

Inspection Device Unboxing – Motorola ET1 Enterprise Tablet

Thursday, February 16th, 2012

As Modern Safety readers may know, we like to share our excitement for new devices that show promise for Field ID users who need rugged handhelds for field inspections. The other day, we received a Motorola ET1 Enterprise Tablet, and we knew we had to capture another unboxing video.

This is a beautiful tablet for rugged environments, and our initial impressions are included in the inspection device unboxing video at the end of this post.

You can read the full specifications for this device here, but we’ve highlighted the basics below:

- WLAN: 802.11a/b/g/n
- GPS: Autonomous GPS
- WPAN: Bluetooth 2.1 with EDR, Integrated antenna
- Camera: Front camera (720p video) and rear camera for bar code scanning and image capture (captures 1D and 2D bar codes)
- Operating System: Runs on Android 2.3.4
- CPU: A OMAP4 dual-core 1 GHz x2 +DSP
- RAM: 1 GB RAM, 4 GB Flash plus 4 GB microSD (totals 8 GB flash memory); will support up to 32 GB microSD
- USB: Two USB interfaces – 1 USB 2.0 OTG connector (docking connector) and 1 USB 2.0 Host connector (expansion module port); HDMI-out
- Expansion: User-accessible Micro SDHC card slot
- Weight & Dimensions: 1.4 lbs./0.63 kg
- Display: 7 in (178mm). capacitive; 1024 x 600; 350 NIT; Corning Gorilla Glass
- Battery: 4620 mAH rechargeable Smart Li-Ion

 

Check out the video unboxing below or on YouTube.

 

Safety compliance fines issued for Indiana stage collapse

Thursday, February 9th, 2012
Indiana State Fair Stage Collapse

The Indiana State Fair Stage Collapse

A lack of safety inspections and serious compliance violations played a big part in the deaths of seven people last August, when the Indiana State Fair stage collapsed in a windstorm. The event drew a lot of attention, not just in the media, but on YouTube and other social websites. Now, three organizations will pay the price for neglecting safety – with fines totaling $80,800.

This was surely one of the more horrifying accidents to watch in 2011. Several dramatic videos of the stage collapse were captured by people in the crowd that day. At the bottom of this post, we’ve included one that captures what happened in slow motion.

This week, the Indiana Department of Labor officially fined three organizations a total of $80,800. Here’s how the fines break down:

- The Indiana State Fair Commission was fined $6,300 for failing to conduct a life safety evaluation, which would have included an assessment of all safety measures and conditions of the Indiana State Fairgrounds concert venues.

- The Local 30 of the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, including Theatrical Payroll Services Inc., was fined $11,500 for three serious violations and one non-serious violation. Citations included failure to consider soil conditions when placing cable anchor points for the grandstand stage; failure to provide fall protection for employees working four feet or more above ground level; and, failure to conduct a personal protective equipment hazard assessment of the worksite.

- Mid-America Sound Corporation was fined a whopping $63,000 for failing to develop and implement an Operations Management Plan, failing to develop a risk assessment plan, failure to maintain and use current engineering calculations and documentation, and failure to provide appropriate, qualified supervision.

The types of serious violations listed above are all too common, and unfortunately it sometimes takes a disaster like this to sound a safety wake-up call for some organizations.

As makers of a leading inspection and compliance management system, we found the non-serious violation just as interesting. In the case of the Local 30 of the International Alliance of Theatrical State Employees, the Department of Labor noted that the organization had failed to maintain proper OSHA records for four years. With Field ID, maintaining compliance electronically is so easy that we find it difficult to understand this kind of neglect. But we do understand that it can be a challenge for non-users.

Here’s a video of the stage collapse, but be advised that the sound is very loud and you may wish to adjust your volume…

Inspections coming for second-largest aircraft maker

Wednesday, February 8th, 2012

Aircraft Safety InspectionsIt was only days ago that we wrote about the safety inspections and manufacturing issues relating to the Airbus A380 – the world’s largest passenger plane, made by the world’s largest aircraft manufacturer.

Now, the world’s second-largest commercial aircraft maker is facing manufacturing problems that could affect production and deliveries. Boeing’s 787 Dreamliner is in the news as production slows due to “incorrect shimming,” which helps close tiny gaps in joints along aft fuselage, on some planes. The problem could potentially lead to “delamination or damage.”

The news comes just as the Boeing 787 Dreamliner was scheduled to land for the first time in Singapore to be showcased at the 2012 Singapore Airshow this month, and only weeks after a malfunction in the flaps system caused a flight cancellation last month. The company has stated that there are no short-term safety concerns for delivered planes, and that those already built will be inspected.

About 59 customers have ordered 870 Dreamliners from Boeing to date, and the recently discovered manufacturing glitches could delay some deliveries. Japan Airlines, for example, was expecting four 787s to arrive this month, but delivery could be pushed to the end of March or later.

Of course, manufacturing and production delays are inconvenient for any business, and they can hurt the bottom line – not just for the companies in the spotlight, but for their suppliers and customers as well. It’s not surprising that the inspection and manufacturing of players like Airbus and Boeing get scrutinized by the media when issues like these are discovered. We’re just glad to see these things being addressed before they can lead to even bigger problems.

As inspection management providers, we know how important it is to implement strong quality control processes and compliance measures at the manufacturing stages for any product – but especially for those designed to safely transport people from one place to another.

Safety inspections and robotics – the story of Bin Bot

Tuesday, February 7th, 2012

Bin Bot Safety RobotAt Modern Safety, we recently blogged about how robotics could change the future of mine safety. This week, we came across another case of a robotic solution to safety risks. This is the story of Bin Bot – a robot designed to lower fatalities and incidents relating to grain bins. As always, we’re thinking about how the Bin Bot could be applied in many situations involving safety inspections and compliance management.

Let’s start with Jerome Mack. When Jerome lost a close friend in a grain bin accident in 1998, he started Mack Robotics, the company behind the Bin Bot. This is the company’s stated motivation:

Our Motivation: Grain Bin Safety

Entrapment and death are real consequences when dealing with grain bins. Too many of us, including the owner of our company, have been affected by these unfortunate tragedies. We want grain bin operations to continue, even increase; but with our employees performing tasks from outside the bin.

Considering that OSHA reported 51 workers were engulfed in grain bins in 2010, and that the year set a new record of 26 deaths relating to grain bins, this mission behind the Bin Bot is more relevant than ever.

The Bin Bot is operated by remote control, from outside of a grain bin. It’s about 6′ x 2′ in size and weighs 800 lbs. This robot can push, pull and lift. With its dust proof metal body, it can knock down a wall of grain. Camera and lighting attachments are optional. And the battery has a 12-hour life before charging is needed.

We think the Bin Bot is another great example of how robotics can improve safety management in the future, without eliminating jobs or the need for a human element in compliance.

Mack Robotics has produced a number of videos about the Bin Bot. Here are a few clips of the Bin Bot in action. Keep in mind, these videos capture a robot in a grain bin, so you might want to lower your volume before clicking play…

 

MSHA compliance inspections to target key safety standards

Friday, February 3rd, 2012

MSHA compliance inspectionsStarting in the spring, special safety and compliance inspections by the Mine Safety and Health Administration will focus on some of the standards that may have the greatest impact on reducing accidents and death in mining. Even though mine fatalities fell to near record lows last year, data from the past decade shows more focus is needed. According to MSHA, 609 miners lost their lives in workplace accidents from 2001 through 2010. Violations associated with eight coal standards contributed to 58 deaths during this period, while violations associated with six metal and nonmetal standards contributed to 47 deaths.

This week, MSHA launched the third phase campaign designed to strengthen efforts to prevent mining fatalities. “Rules to Live By III: Preventing Common Mining Deaths” focuses on 14 safety standards, each chosen because related violations contributed to at least five mining accidents and at least five deaths during last decade. The first phase of “Rules to Live By” began one year ago.

Beginning April 1, MSHA will focus more attention on these 14 standards with enhanced enforcement efforts, increased scrutiny for related violations, and instructions to inspectors for more carefully evaluating gravity and negligence.

Here are the standards under the microscope for this phase of the “Rules to Live By” program:

Coal Mining Standards

-75.362(a)(1) on-shift examination

-77.404(a) machinery and equipment; operation and maintenance

-77.405(b) performing work from a raised position; safeguards

-77.1000 highwalls, pits and spoil banks; plans

-77.1605(b) loading and haulage equipment; installations

-77.1606(a) loading and haulage equipment; inspection and maintenance

-77.1607(b) loading and haulage equipment; operation

-77.1713(a) daily inspection of surface coal mine; certified person; reports of inspection

Metal and Nonmetals Standards

-46.7(a) new task training

-56.3130 wall, bank and slope stability

-56.3200 correction of hazardous conditions

-56.15020 life jackets and belts

-56.14100(b) safety defects; examination, correction and records

-57.14100(b) safety defects; examination, correction and records

MSHA inspectors will be receiving online training to promote consistency in enforcement activity across the agency. The agency will also provide mine operators with program and resource information, and it will be reaching out to engage miners and their representatives during the course of MSHA inspections to disseminate appropriate compliance assistance materials, including engineering suggestions, safety target materials packages and other resources.

“In 2011, mining deaths fell to the second lowest annual total on record – a testament to the commitment of miners, mine operators, miners’ representatives, labor and industry organizations, state agencies and grantees, members of the mining community and MSHA,” said Main. “While the mining community achieved near-record low numbers of mining deaths in the United States and has seen a significant decline in fatal mining accidents during the past 10 years, too many miners still lose their lives in preventable accidents. The loss of even one miner causes devastation and pain to the victim’s family, friends and co-workers.”

For more information, you can check MSHA’s “Rules to Live By” page here.