Posts Tagged ‘Inspection Software’

How Far We’ve Come in Safety Inspection

Wednesday, April 11th, 2012

Field IDWhen I pulled my car into the service bay at the auto repair shop, a service agent scribbled the car’s VIN number onto a small scrap a paper. Another agent followed, taking down my name on a pad of paper.

The quaint method of collecting data started me wondering. How many mistakes can happen when you rely on a pen and paper? With modern information technology easier to use than ever, does it make sense to rely on clipboards? Before long, I had doubts. Is this shop behind-the-times if it isn’t using modern information technology? Do I trust them with my car? Is this place safe? (more…)

Exceeding expectations on mobile devices

Tuesday, April 3rd, 2012

When you make inspection software for mobile devices, you notice when new research highlights things like what people expect from the technology. Even though the following statistics focus on mobile websites rather than apps, we found these details about tablet users’ expectations to be a great benchmark. It seems mobile device speeds are getting faster by the month, and anyone who runs a website or develops mobile applications must keep up the pace.

A few days ago we noticed a new study by Compuware that highlighted statistics about what tablet users expect from their mobile web experiences. “Engaging the Tablet User: What They Expect from Websites” has been called the first global study of its kind. It involved a survey of over 2,000 end users in North America, Europe and Asia who have accessed the Internet on a tablet in the last six months. (more…)

Construction industry growth must align with safety

Tuesday, March 27th, 2012

Construction SafetyAs the construction industry grows, so does the need for effective safety management and jobsite auditing practices. And for the most part, the outlook for construction equipment, jobs and projects looks pretty good lately.

This month, the Construction Sector Council (CSC) released details from its latest forecast of workforce supply and demand, called “Construction Looking Forward.” If you’re not familiar with P.E.I, it’s one of the smallest provinces here in Canada. But even though they’re smaller than other provinces, they’re expecting a local boom in the construction labour force. The CSC predicts that about 1,500 workers will be needed to close gaps by retiring workers and fill new jobs. And another 1,500 will be needed for New Brunswick, 6,000 for Nova Scotia, 2,200 for Newfoundland and Labrador – all Atlantic provinces.

In Ontario, the CSC predicts that the construction labour force will rise by 43,000 over the next nine years, and with 77,000 retiring workers needing to be replaced, the total new recruit count will be closer to 120,000. The council predicts record high employment levels for Manitoba, where 16,000 new recruits will be needed, and British Columbia, where meeting industry demand will require 44,000 new construction workers. Other provinces like Saskatchewan also celebrated growth in the industry. While we haven’t covered them all, we’re sure you get the picture: Canada’s construction industry looks like it has a bright near future.

On the global scale, growth in the construction equipment industry is also signaling a rise in demand. Occupational Health & Safety magazine reported on that growth today, focusing on positive results from companies like Volvo Group and Caterpillar. According to OH&S, Volvo Construction Equipment’s deliveries rose by 30%, and the company is expanding with new plants planned for manufacturing excavators and articulated haulers, and of course providing jobs for the regions where these new plants appear. Similarly, Caterpillar reported a 41% rise in sales and 83% rise in profits from 2010 to 2011.

The news isn’t all positive, though. We also found recent figures from the Association General Contractors of America (AGC) highlighting employment declines and job losses. According to the AGC, U.S. construction jobs declined in 111 out of 337 metropolitan areas. But about 169 areas saw increases.

“The mixed construction employment results reflect the conflict between slowly rebounding private sector demand for construction and declining public sector investments,” said Ken Simonson, the association’s chief economist. “For every metro area that is adding construction jobs, there is another one where construction employment continues to fall or is stagnant.”

Here’s a breakdown on the job losses and increases for certain areas, from the AGC:

The largest job losses were in Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, Fla. (-7,100 jobs, -14 percent), followed by Chicago-Joliet-Naperville, Ill. (-5,200 jobs, -5 percent); Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach-Deerfield Beach, Fla. (-3,400 jobs, -11 percent) and New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, La. (-3,300 jobs, -11 percent). Springfield, Mass.-Conn. (-23 percent, -1,800 jobs) lost the highest percentage. Other areas experiencing large percentage declines in construction employment included Anniston-Oxford, Ala. (-20 percent, -200 jobs) and Oshkosh-Neenah, Wis. (-19 percent, -600 jobs).

Atlantic City-Hammonton, N.J. added the highest percentage of new construction jobs (45 percent, 1,700 jobs) followed by Bakersfield-Delano, Calif. (31 percent, 4,000 jobs). Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, Ore.-Wash. added the most jobs (5,300 jobs, 13 percent). Other areas adding a large number of jobs included Denver-Aurora-Broomfield, Colo. (5,000 jobs, 8 percent); Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, Ga. (5,000 jobs, 6 percent); Indianapolis-Carmel, Ind. (4,600 jobs, 14 percent) and Bakersfield-Delano, Calif.

As job numbers fluctuate, safety should be part of filling any gaps. On any scale, it will affect the bottom line. If you’re in charge of filling safety roles for any organization, remember that retiring workers can signal the opportunity for positive change. Is it time to take another look at how you manage safety? If you’re hiring for a safety position, do you look for new approaches and new thinking from your candidates? Bringing in new blood is a great way to inspire change and improve performance with new safety solutions.

New chemical safety standard from OSHA

Thursday, March 22nd, 2012

Chemical SafetyA newly revised chemical safety standard covering labeling and classification should benefit workers by reducing confusion about chemical hazards in the workplace, facilitating safety training and improving understanding of hazards, especially for low literacy workers. OSHA’s new Hazard Communication standard will classify chemicals according to their health and physical hazards, and establish consistent labels and safety data sheets for all chemicals made in the United States and imported from abroad.

The new Hazard Communication Standard will prevent an estimated 43 deaths and 585 annual workplace injuries and illnesses. OSHA says it will also result in $475.2 million in enhanced productivity for U.S. businesses each year, as well as cost savings of $32.2 million for American businesses that periodically update safety data sheets and labels for chemicals covered under the standard. The standard is now aligned with the United Nations’ global chemical labeling system, but it won’t be fully implemented until 2016.

“Exposure to hazardous chemicals is one of the most serious dangers facing American workers today,” said Secretary of Labor Hilda L. Solis. “Revising OSHA’s Hazard Communication Standard will improve the quality, consistency and clarity of hazard information that workers receive, making it safer for workers to do their jobs and easier for employers to stay competitive in the global marketplace.”

During the transition period to the effective completion dates noted in the standard, chemical manufacturers, importers, distributors and employers may comply with either 29 Code of Federal Regulations 1910.1200 (the final standard), the current standard or both.

According to a fact sheet on the new rule, the following are the major changes implemented by the revised standard:

  • Hazard classification: The rule provides specific criteria for classification of health and physical hazards, as well as classification of mixtures.
  • Labels: Chemical manufacturers and importers will be required to provide a label that includes a harmonized signal word, pictogram, and hazard statement for each hazard class and category. Precautionary statements must also be provided.
  • Safety Data Sheets: Will now have a specified 16-section format.
  • Information and training: Employers are required to train workers by December 1, 2013 on the new labels elements and safety data sheets format to facilitate recognition and understanding.

Changes from the Proposed to the Final Rule include:

  • Maintaining the disclosure of exposure limits (Threshold Limit Values [TLVs]) established by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) and carcinogen status from nationally and internationally recognized lists of carcinogens on the safety data sheets;
  • Clarification that the borders of pictograms must be red on the label;
  • Flexibility regarding the required precautionary and hazard statements to allow label preparers to consolidate and/or eliminate inappropriate or redundant statements; and
  • Longer deadlines for full implementation of the standard.

“OSHA’s 1983 Hazard Communication Standard gave workers the right to know,” said Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health Dr. David Michaels. “As one participant expressed during our rulemaking process, this update will give them the right to understand, as well.”

Further information for workers, employers and downstream users of hazardous chemicals can be reviewed at OSHA’s Hazard Communication Safety and Health topics here – including links to OSHA’s revised Hazard Communication Standard and guidance materials such as Q and A’s, OSHA fact sheet and Quick Cards.

Aviation safety at risk in Canada?

Tuesday, March 20th, 2012

Aviation SafetyAviation safety, inspections and aircraft maintenance issues are at the heart of some of the stories developing around Canada’s largest airline and regulator this week. Overall, it seems the industry is hitting some severe turbulence lately.

Air Canada is facing a long list of issues spanning business conflicts, labour disputes, and politics. And Transport Canada is under fire with criticism around the safety of airports and the lack of resources going toward inspections.

So what exactly is going on?

Let’s start with Air Canada. The company that maintains Air Canada’s fleet, Aveos, officially filed for bankruptcy protection this week and has eliminated close to 1,600 jobs. According to the Montreal Gazette, Aveos claims Air Canada owes stopped delivering planes for repairs, resulting in a $16-million revenue drop in less than two months. While the airline has about 2,300 of its own mechanics who do line maintenance, daily routine inspections and repairs, Aveos handled the bulk of thorough checks and overhauls. It’s a sticky situation, which has led to worker protests and union involvement. The International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers has raised safety questions around the possibility that Air Canada will outsource the work following the Aveos filing.

Air Canada has stated its commitment to safety with details on its website: “Safety is Air Canada’s highest priority and the safety of Air Canada’s fleet will not be compromised by this development. The airline will continue to uphold the highest standards for passenger safety.”

All of this is going on amid other stories about unusually large numbers of pilots are calling in sick, resulting in cancelled flights, and the government intervening in labour disputes to force Air Canada workers out of a strike position – a decision that may now be challenged in court.

For Transport Canada and the Conservative government, the week began with direct challenges from the Public Service Alliance of Canada (Quebec Region) around air transport and civil aviation safety. PSAC-Quebec issued an announcement yesterday and hosted a press conference today, with support from three Members of Parliament, to speak out against further budget cuts affecting plane inspections.

“PSAC-Québec is extremely concerned over the fact that increasingly fewer planes are being inspected by Transport Canada inspectors,” said Magali Picard, alternate Regional Executive Vice-President, PSAC-Québec. “Due to a lack of resources, Transport Canada has shifted from physical inspections of aircraft to paper inspections. It is totally appalling! We can’t help but conclude that even moderate cuts of 5% in the March 29 budget will cause severe pain.”

They aren’t the only ones calling into question the resources and policy behind federal aviation inspectors. A few months ago, a former federal aviation inspector spoke with the CBC about how a new “safety management systems” approach at Transport Canada created so much frustration that he quit. The CBC story gives a detailed glimpse into inspection-related challenges at Transport Canada and issues related to the oversight of aircraft carriers. It reminded us of another story about falsified safety reports and improper oversight in the airline industry.

When businesses go down, labour disputes arise, and safety practices come into question, it’s never good news. But is aviation safety at risk? People who fly a lot will tell you that a little turbulence is nothing to worry about, and maybe they’re right. We just hope that when the dust settles, no sacrifices will be made when it comes to maintenance and inspections designed to keep flying safe.