Posts Tagged ‘workplace safety’

Workplace safety solutions needed to address economic burden of injuries

Thursday, January 26th, 2012

workplace safety solutionsWorkplace safety advocates often talk about the high cost of neglecting safety and prevention measures, but the overall medical and health care costs of job-related injuries and illnesses are even “greater than generally assumed,” according to a new study. In fact, the costs are higher than those racked up by cancer and stroke. And the argument for workplaces to adopt better workplace safety management solutions grows even stronger…

Workplace injury and illnesses cost the United States about $250 billion per year, according to the newly published research. The study, titled “Economic Burden of Occupational Injury and Illness in the United States,” was detailed in the latest issue of the Milbank Quarterly, a multidisciplinary journal of population health and health policy.

Here are the official findings, directly from the study:

Findings: The number of fatal and nonfatal injuries in 2007 was estimated to be more than 5,600 and almost 8,559,000, respectively, at a cost of $6 billion and $186 billion. The number of fatal and nonfatal illnesses was estimated at more than 53,000 and nearly 427,000, respectively, with cost estimates of $46 billion and $12 billion. For injuries and diseases combined, medical cost estimates were $67 billion (27% of the total), and indirect costs were almost $183 billion (73%). Injuries comprised 77 percent of the total, and diseases accounted for 23 percent. The total estimated costs were approximately $250 billion, compared with the inflation-adjusted cost of $217 billion for 1992.”

We found this to be an amazingly high cost, but we were even more surprised that the study’s author, J. Paul Leigh, declared the costs to be “at least as large as the cost of cancer.” Only about 25 per cent of the costs, adds Leigh, are covered by workers’ compensation, so “all members of society share the burden” of these costs.

Industries and businesses with higher rates of jobsite or worker injury may need to look at how safety is currently being managed. There’s always room for improvement. This $250 billion cost to the economy may seem somewhat abstract in the context of day-to-day operations, but chances are that there’s a real cost you can assign to downtime caused by worker injury or illness – no matter what business you’re in.

Safety data from 5,000 organizations to be included in groundbreaking study

Wednesday, December 14th, 2011
Safety Data

Safety Data

A new study by the Institute for Work & Health and four Ontario-based health and safety associations will be one of the largest ever completed in the province – with the aim of gathering information from up to 5,000 organizations.  That’s a lot of safety data! The study’s full name is “Benchmarking leading organizational indicators for the prevention and management of injuries and illnesses,” but it’s also known as the “5,000 firms study.”

A story in Canadian Occupational Safety yesterday notes that the organizations will be chosen from the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board’s database for this study, which project lead Dr. Ben Amick calls “a groundbreaking project, which could potentially have huge implications for Ontario’s prevention system.” Every participating organization will, at the end of the study, receive a report on how it measured up against others.

According to the Institute for Work & Health, the goals of the study are:

- to survey between 4,500 and 5,000 Ontario firms on various organizational measures considered important predictors of injury, illness and workers’ compensation claim rates, including measures of organizational policies and practices, safety culture, OHS management systems and employee relations/joint health and safety committee functioning

- to link these findings to the firms’ past five years of work-related injury and illness claims and one year of claims going forward

- to use this information to identify which leading organizational indicators are relevant and can be used by the OHS community.

For the participating organizations, this study’s safety reports will be invaluable tools for measuring success and identifying areas for improvement. We know how valuable it can be to score yourself on safety, but it’s also invaluable to find out how you score within the context of an industry.  If you are looking to get involved in the study and are located in Ontario, there’s contact information available from Canadian Occupational Safety at the story linked above.

Overall, this study looks like it will produce some great information, which will probably be relevant to organizations outside of its geographic focus. We’re looking forward to checking out the results, and will probably share a few details here on Modern Safety.

Are you ready for a safety inspection blitz?

Tuesday, October 25th, 2011

This month, as part of the Safety at Work strategy, the Ontario Ministry of Labour launched a blitz on safety inspections for personal protective equipment in the health care and industrial sectors. For health and industrial workplaces across Ontario, this means a blitz of safety inspections with a focus on making sure that equipment is the appropriate choice for protection, is being properly used, and is well-maintained.Personal protective equipment

Every year, thousands of workers and companies lose time to preventable injuries and incidents involving personal protective equipment (PPE). In 2010, more than 1,500 head injuries were recorded in Ontario and another 1,120 suffered foot injuries caused by crushing, puncturing or dousing with hazardous substances. Another 1,075 workers suffered injuries that caused temporary or permanent vision loss due to impacts with objects.

So the need for a safety blitz was clear. At Field ID, we see safety initiatives for various industries as being important tasks year-round, but a blitz like this can be an important wake-up call about implementing or reviewing your safety management processes. Workplace injuries can result in serious lost time and productivity interruptions for a lot of businesses, but more importantly, neglecting safety can lower the quality of life for workers and their families. Ineffective or irregular safety inspections on personal protective equipment can lead to a wide range of injuries that can mean big setbacks for workers, both on the job and at home. Eye injuries due to flying particles or chemicals, or head/foot injuries from falling objects, can affect a person outside of his or her workplace, for extended periods in some cases. Effective Inspection and Safety Compliance Management can prevent these injuries from happening.

Canadian Occupational Safety reported this week on the specifics that Ministry safety inspectors will be looking for throughout the blitz. In general, the Ministry of Labour’s Personal Protective Equipment Enforcement Blitz will focus on safety inspections across a number of sectors, including:

  • Wood & metal fabrication
  • Vehicle sales and service
  • Food & beverage
  • Wholesalers
  • Education
  • Hospitals
  • Long term care homes

Ministry safety inspectors have performed more than 266,000 field visits and 34 safety inspection blitzes since 2008. They’ve also issued more than 426,000 safety compliance orders. If you’re in safety management, it’s a good time to ask yourself if your safety inspection processes are in order, and if they’re doing the job.

At Field ID, we aim to make safety simple. Inspection software can make meeting safety requirements an easy routine to follow, so when a another blitz like this comes around, you’ll be ready to pass.

Ontario to Conduct Mine Safety Inspection Blitz

Wednesday, October 19th, 2011

MinersThe Government of Ontario will be targeting mine ventilation hazards with a safety inspection blitz in the months of October and November.  You can read the official announcement made this week on the Ontario Ministry of Labour website here.  This Initiative is all part of a strategy that Ontario launched back in 2008 called “Safe at Work Ontario”.

These safety blitz’s are very important to workplace safety.  From 2005 to 2009 there were 176 work deaths related to respiratory illnesses in the mining industry.  Clearly the Government of Ontario put the Safe at Work Ontario program in place to help get this number down to zero.

What are They Looking For?

(Taken directly from the Ontario website)
Inspectors will target underground mines that use diesel equipment. This includes:
  • - Mines with large fleets of diesel equipment operating in the underground environment
  • - Recently reopened or new mines operating diesel equipment
  • - Mines where previous ventilation concerns were observed, and
  • - Mines with a poor health and safety compliance history.
Inspectors will check on two types of equipment:
  • - Ventilation systems used to deliver fresh air to underground mines, and
  • - Diesel equipment used for underground transportation of workers and materials and blasting of rock.

Preparing for a Blitz

Organizations can prepare for a blitz by implementing modern safety techniques and performing their own inspections on a regular basis before OSHA or the Ministry of Labour comes on site.  It is easy to draw comparisons to accounting practices and preparing for an accounting audit by the government.  Knowing that there may be an audit at any time forces organizations to have their financial information in tip top shape at all times.  Safety data should be treated in the exact same way.  The current blitz focuses on ventilation systems for mines that run a lot of diesel equipment.  Having monthly safety inspections done internally with a dashboard that rolls up to the CEO or Director of Safety showing missed inspections for instance can make the preparation for an external audit a breeze.

A Visit to California: Rigging Inspections and Facility Safety Management (FSM)

Monday, August 29th, 2011

Shaun California Hotel

What’s your favorite thing to do while stuck on a train?  Mine is apparently write blog posts.  Our faithful readers will know that this is my second blog post written from a train. Don’t worry, this one is not about train safety.  On a side note, I have never been on a train that didn’t get “stuck” some how or another.

Back on topic: I am coming home from a road trip where I visited California (LA area) and Rochester.  This blog post is about the California part of my trip (that’s my Long Beach Motel on the left, got a great deal).  Later this week I will blog about Rochester.   While in California I had the pleasure of meeting with 3 Field ID customers.  Have I ever mentioned how much I LOVE meeting Field ID partners and customers and seeing them use Field ID in action?

A Rigging Shop

On day one I visited with a new customer and partner of ours in safety compliance for rigging, Lift-It Manufacturing.  Lift-It is a leader in the manufacturing and distribution of synthetic lifting slings.  We work with rigging manufacturers quite a bit and this industry is heavily regulated.  Creating and keeping track of certificates of conformance is a huge headache.  It was great to spend some time with the folks at Lift-It.

Two Manufacturering Companies

One my second and third day I visited with two manufacturing companies that use Field ID.  Each of these organizations have been using Field ID on a small scale to do all types of inspection and certification tracking over the past year and I was visiting them to see how we can improve and grow the Field ID deployment.  Both days were amazing and extremely educational for me.  These deployments are what I have referred to in the past as facility safety management (FSM) and includes managing:

  1. employee training certification management
  2. environmental inspection management
  3. fire extinguisher inspection management
  4. crane inspection management
  5. lockout / tagout management

I think we are off to a great start with these deployments and continue to improve through these types of on-site visits.  Like I said earlier in this post, visiting Field ID customers is one of my favorite things to do.  Not only was this a good learning opportunity, but meeting people face-to-face after talking on the phone and through online meetings is a bonus as well.

I jumped in a plane to Rochester after I was done in California where I spent time with people from the Nuclear community.  More on that later this week!